Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters

Language
Document Type
Year range
2.
ssrn; 2021.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-SSRN | ID: ppzbmed-10.2139.ssrn.3859298

ABSTRACT

Background: Duration and quality of immunity to SARS-CoV-2 have significant implications for the management of COVID-19 pandemic. Here, we present a comprehensive set of immunological data from a cohort of individuals (n=43), 12 months after mild COVID-19 disease and in the absence of virus re-exposure.Methods: Serum and PBMC were collected from mild-COVID-19 convalescents 12 months after the COVID-19 positive PCR (n=43) and from healthy SARS-CoV-2-seronegative controls (n=15). Serum titers of SARS-CoV-2-specific immunoglobulins were quantified by ELISA and virus neutralisation activity was assessed using SARS-CoV-2-Spike pseudovirus particles. Frequencies of Spike and RBD-specific memory B cells were quantified by flow cytometry. Magnitude of memory T cell responses was quantified and phenotyped with an activation-induced marker assay.Findings: In the absence of re-exposure to SARS-CoV-2 Spike- and RBD-specific antibodies were present in 90% of COVID-19 convalescents 12 months post-infection. RBD-specific IgG + memory B cells were maintained in 88.9% of patients, while 62% of patients had serum neutralising activity. Functionally mature memory CD4 + and CD8 + T cells were maintained at frequencies previously reported for earlier time points post-COVID-19, indicating substantial maintenance of durable T cell responses. Interpretations: Immunity to SARS-CoV-2 persists for 12 months in mild COVID-19 convalescent patients that retain high Spike-specific antibody titres, virus neutralisation capacity and circulating RBD-specific memory B cells. Significantly, T cell immunity remained stable 12 months post-infection. This study offers vital information on the duration of natural COVID-19 immunity and its potential protective effect against SARS-CoV-2 reinfection and clinical disease, with clear implications for the ongoing management of the global pandemic. Funding Statement: This work was funded by project grants from The Hospital Research Foundation and Women’s and Children’s Foundation, Adelaide, Australia. This work has been supported by NIH contract 75N9301900065 (A.S, D.W).Declaration of Interests: A.S. is currently a consultant for Gritstone, Flow Pharma, Arcturus, Epitogenesis, Oxfordimmunotech, Caprion and Avalia. LJI has filed for patent protection for various aspects of T cell epitope and vaccine design work.Authors PGV, CMH, MGM, AELY, HB, ZAM, ZAD, AA, DA, JG, CF, SO, EMM, DJL, GM, EJG, BAJR, DS, CKL, MRB, DW, RAB, SCB and BGB declare no conflict of interest.Ethics Approval Statement: Study protocols were approved by the Central Adelaide Clinical Human Research Ethics Committee (#13050) and the Women’s and Children’s Health Network Human research ethics (protocol HREC/19/WCHN/65), Adelaide, Australia.


Subject(s)
Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic, Familial , Cystic Fibrosis , COVID-19
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL